Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,354 answers , 22,792 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Is the early cosmos subject to gravitational time dilation?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
192 views

Since the early universe was much more dense and clumpy (evidence are the SMBHs detected by JWST at high redshift) than today, gravitational time dilation due to the stronger gravitational potential of matter should result. But why do cosmologists ignore these effects and agree on a linear cosmic time scale and a corresponding continuous cosmological redshift for describing the evolution of the universe?

asked Sep 7 in Astronomy by rhkail (0 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized Sep 8 by Dilaton

The relation between redshift and look-back time can be found for example in Bergström, Goobar "Cosmology and Particle Astrophysics". This look-back time is the difference in cosmological time between "now" and a given event in the past. The derivation in the book is based on the Robertson-Walker metric and thus presupposes a homogeneous and isotropic universe (i.e., no clumpiness (at least not on cosmological distances)). 

As for clumpy matter: The effects of time dilation are most notable in the vicinity of the clump. Viewed at large scale, such a clump is a "particle" in an on average homogeneous universe.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...