Quantcast
Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.
W3Counter Web Stats

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public β tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,106 questions , 2,251 unanswered
5,413 answers , 23,081 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
822 active unimported users
More ...

  The Born rule -- 100 years ago and today

Originality
+ 0 - 0
Accuracy
+ 0 - 0
Score
0.00
143 views
Referee this paper: arXiv:2502.08545 by Arnold Neumaier

Please use comments to point to previous work in this direction, and reviews to referee the accuracy of the paper. Feel free to edit this submission to summarise the paper (just click on edit, your summary will then appear under the horizontal line)

(Is this your paper?)


Abstract: Details of the contents, and formulations of the Born rule changed considerably from its inception by Born in 1926 to the present day. Based to a large extent on little known results from the recent books 'Coherent Quantum Physics' by Neumaier and 'Algebraic Quantum Physics', Vol. 1 by Neumaier and Westra, this paper traces the early history 100 years ago, its generalization (essential for today's quantum optics and quantum information theory) to POVMs 50 year ago, and a modern derivation from an intuitive definition of the notion of a quantum detector. Also discussed is the extent to which the various forms of the Born rule have, like any other statement in physics, a restricted domain of validity, which leads to problems when applied outside this domain.

requested Feb 16 by Arnold Neumaier (15787 points)
summarized by Arnold Neumaier
paper authored Feb 12 to quant-ph by Arnold Neumaier
  • [ revision history ]
    edited Feb 17 by Arnold Neumaier

    Haven't had a chance to read the paper yet, but from the contents I was curious what happened in 1970, and thereby encountered the claim that POVMs offer a generalization of the Born rule! This is quite interesting, I never heard this before (but then I haven't thought much about POVMs). This makes me curious about a lot of things:

    Apparently weak measurements are described by POVMs. Long ago, Howard Wiseman tried to ground Bohmian mechanics in weak measurements, does this mean POVMs offer a new perspective on Bohmian mechanics too? 

    Do POVMs have any special relationship to that other generalization of quantum mechanics, the Gell-Mann-Hartle-Omnes consistent/decoherent history? (edit: And how about Weinberg's generalization of QM, in which density matrices rather than state vectors are fundamental?) 

    What about the measurement theory of relativistic QFT or string theory? What do POVMs look like there? How are they related to von Neumann algebras? (which have recently been of interest in quantum gravity)

    Sorry for bringing up so many tangents! 

    @MitchellPorter: 

    1. weak measurements: No - Bohmain: No 

    2. decoherent history: Yes 

    3. rel.QFT : no easy answer.

    Please start new threads for the second and third question, so that there is some structure in the discussion.

    Your Review:

    Please use reviews only to (at least partly) review submissions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
    To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
    Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
    This is the review box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
    Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
    Your name to display (optional):
    Anti-spam verification:
    If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol in the following word:
    pysicsOverlow
    Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
    Please complete the anti-spam verification




    user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

    Your rights
    ...