• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,743 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Finding the approximate solution for Schrodinger equation by using variational method

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I need to find the approximate solution of nonlinear Schrodinger equation $$ i\hbar \partial_{t} \Psi + \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \Psi - g |\Psi|^{2}\Psi - \frac{m\omega^2 (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}{2}\Psi = 0 $$ by using variational method. $\Psi$ has norm $\int |\Psi|^{2}d^{3}\mathbf r = N$, where N is the number of particles.

It was saying to me that I must start from the trial function $$ \Psi (x, y, z) = h e^{-\frac{1}{2\omega^{2}}\left( x^2 + y^2 + z^2\right)}e^{\frac{i}{\hbar}\mu t}, $$

where $\mu$ plays role of chemical potential.

So by using the property of $\Psi$ I got $h = \frac{\sqrt{N}}{(\omega \pi )^{\frac{3}{4}}}$. Then, due to the variational method, I must compute functional $J(N) = \langle \Psi | \hat {H}| \Psi\rangle$ and determine N from relation $\frac{\partial J (N)}{\partial N} = 0$. But I don't understand this step, because $N$ already is given in the task and equal to the integer number. So I don't have parameters in the trial function which can minimize functional $J(N)$.

Can you help me? Maybe, there is the mistake in the trial function and it must be some parameter $l^2$ instead of $\omega^{2}$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrew McAddams

asked Dec 4, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Andrew McAddams (340 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Mar 25, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Minimizing the energy with respect to $N$ will give a relationship between $\mu$, $N$, and the other parameters of the system. This will fix the chemical potential to something like $\mu=gN$ (this is the correct value in the limit $\omega\to0$).

For sure the trial wave-function has a problem since $x^2/\omega^2$ is not dimensionless, but it seems quite obvious that you should just use the typical length scale given by the harmonic oscillator (that you called $l$, if I guess correctly).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Adam
answered Dec 4, 2013 by Adam (115 points) [ no revision ]
Thank you. So you meaned that I get from $\langle \Psi |\hat {H}| \Psi \rangle $ expression $J(N, l)$ from the one side and $\mu $ from the another, which leads to fixing $\mu$? Is this step all that I must to do?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Andrew McAddams
@AndrewMcAdams: because you're looking for an eigenstate of $\hat H$, you have $\langle \Psi|\hat H|\Psi\rangle/\langle \Psi|\Psi\rangle=\mu$, and you want to minimize this to get the ground-state (or to as close to it as possible with this ansatz).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-21 17:05 (UCT), posted by SE-user Adam

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights