Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

206 submissions , 164 unreviewed
5,103 questions , 2,249 unanswered
5,355 answers , 22,800 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Laplace transform in solving 2d wave equation

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
1455 views

I have the following wave equation $\dfrac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}+\dfrac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2}=\dfrac{1}{c^2}\dfrac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}$ with boundary conditions at $x=0,\ u=\sin(\omega t )\sin(n\pi y)$ at $x=l,\ u=0$ and at $y=0,\ u=0;\ y=1, u=0$. I derived results taking Laplace transform in time $\left(\dfrac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2}+\dfrac{\partial^2 U}{\partial y^2}=\dfrac{s^2 U}{c^2}\right)$, and it has the solution $\dfrac{\sin(k(l-x))}{\sin(kl)}\sin(\omega t)\sin(n\pi y)+\mbox{transients}$. The result doesn't seem to give traveling wave solution but a standing wave solution in $x$ and $y$.

I'm wondering if I should take a double Laplace transform in $x$ and $t$. Can someone please let me know if that approach will help? Also, will I be able to capture traveling waves, say before it reaches the boundary at $x=l$?

PS: $U$ is Laplace transform of $u$ in $t$. The initial conditions are 0.

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-09 19:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user vijay
asked Dec 11, 2012 in Mathematics by Vijay (15 points) [ no revision ]
If you prescribe initial conditions then there is only one solution, you cannot expect to just arbitrarily get "travelling waves". If you don't prescribe initial conditions, then observe that if $u$ is a solution to the boundary value problem and $v$ solves $v_{xx} + v_{yy} = v_{tt}/c^2$ with zero boundary conditions, then $u+v$ also solves the boundary value problem. So you can play with the frequencies of $v$ to get a "traveling wave".

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-09 19:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user Willie Wong

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

The best method should be using separation of variables rather than using Laplace transform.

The general solution is of the form $u(x,y,t)=\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_1(r,s)\sin xr\sin ys\sin(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_2(r,s)\sin xr\sin ys\cos(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_3(r,s)\sin xr\cos ys\sin(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_4(r,s)\sin xr\cos ys\cos(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_5(r,s)\cos xr\sin ys\sin(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_6(r,s)\cos xr\sin ys\cos(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_7(r,s)\cos xr\cos ys\sin(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds+\int_0^\infty\int_0^\infty C_8(r,s)\cos xr\cos ys\cos(ct\sqrt{r^2+s^2})~dr~ds$

Now substitute the conditions $u(0,y,t)=\sin n\pi y\sin\omega t$ , $u(l,y,t)=0$ , $u(x,0,t)=0$ and $u(x,1,t)=0$ for eliminating some of the arbitrary functions.

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-09 19:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user doraemonpaul
answered Dec 22, 2012 by doraemonpaul (20 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverf$\varnothing$ow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...