Register

Adv. Query

Q&A (4870)

Reviews (203)

Open problems (47)
Meta (439)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,789 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

What postulates or models have been proposed to fix the number of particle generations?

1045 views

I understand that the question of the number of generations, while practically settled experimentally, is an open issue from the point of view of theoretical models. I can only think of two theoretical arguments to set bounds in this number:

to get some CP violation, we need at least 3 generations in the CKM matrix.
to keep the sign of the beta function of QCD under control, we can not have more than 16.5 flavours, so 8 generations.

Are there more arguments in the theoretical/phenomenology market, bounding the number of generations in some way? And, is there any that fixes it exactly to three?

asked Aug 29, 2014 in Phenomenology by - (260 points) [ no revision ]

Slightly related: http://www.physicsoverflow.org/7671/gut-that-includes-all-3-particle-families-into-a-large-group

commented Aug 29, 2014 by Dilaton (6,240 points) [ no revision ]

yep, feel free to upvote my old answer there :-D.

I guess that arguments to select a family of models also match the answer here, if they are able to provide at least a bound in the number of generations.

commented Aug 29, 2014 by - (260 points) [ no revision ]

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

Please complete the anti-spam verification

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights

...