Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

178 submissions , 140 unreviewed
4,360 questions , 1,685 unanswered
5,108 answers , 21,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
651 active unimported users
More ...

  How can we test a theory of everything?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
80 views

Here are two possible, rather different, answers:

- Use the theory of everything to calculate and then to measure deviations either form the standard model or from general relativity. Compare the results.

- Use the theory of everything to calculate the constants of the standard model (the mass of the electron, 137.03, muon mass, quark masses), and compare the calculation results with measurements.

Which answer is more correct?

Which answer is more realistic?

Are there other answers?

asked Nov 19 in Open problems by anonymous [ no revision ]
edited Nov 19

it's almost the 2nd answer. How it could be different? Basically, the theory must predict all the experiments outcomes, but not necessarily with the previous paradigms. In such theory, one can imagine that old constants lose a part of their meaning and that new constants appear; ideally, a set of the needed background pure math theories.

Now, for many aspects, the SM is a TOE. Thus, I think you are meaning a single small set of axioms from which all the sub theories can be derived without fundamental additions. Why does it exist and weither is it reachable today are open questions.

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

In order to formulate a theory of everything one must carry out the experiements of everything at least.

answered Nov 19 by Vladimir Kalitvianski (142 points) [ no revision ]

and if the universe (multiverse) is infinite, then there are quite a lot of experiments to be done... :-D


 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...