Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

143 submissions , 120 unreviewed
3,899 questions , 1,377 unanswered
4,834 answers , 20,491 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
494 active unimported users
More ...

  Import queue

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
12506 views

Request questions from sites on the StackExchange networks that are on-topic here too, to be imported here. Moderators may then import the question.

Addendum

This thread can not only be used to request importing single questions, but PhysicsOverflow members who like some or all of their (for PhysicsOverflow on topic) SE posts imported can say so in a corresponding answer here too. Any other specific list of questions is fine too.

asked Feb 8, 2014 in Public Official Posts by Dilaton (4,295 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 5, 2015 by dimension10
Most voted comments show all comments

I will mention some questions we listed here too, if I am at a second look not 100% certain about importing them and interpret the upvotes as agreement with getting them.

I mean all of those questions should have been ok on Physics SE, but I am sometimes not sure if other people think they are a good fit for PhysicsOverflow too.
 

I have recategorised this under "Public Official Threads" so users can request their posts to be imported as per your addendum.  

To keep this page from growing to infinity,should we delete the questions regarding those that actually got imported?

@RonMaimon I agree, but hide, not delete (delete erases from the database itself).  

@Dilaton On SE, answers can be ordered by time if one needs to, but not here.  

I meant it moved to a random position in the questions list, it wasn't bumped anymore.

Most recent comments show all comments
@RonMaimon hiding is ok But concerning references and study material (concerning advanced topics) they newer cluttered any site on SE (not the ones I was interested in) so they will not here either. They were considered legitimate in TP.SE and they are not forbidden on MathOverflow. So please dont introduce this for (advanced) students and people who want to learn about a new topic obstructive SE point of view (in SE they always said you can ask in chat which means forget about it because there are no physics people in chat)

ok, but the point is that it shouldn't come with rep, and it's extremely easy to do, and it only needs to be done once in each topic, so perhaps when reviews are up, it can be done in reviews. You can ask the same question on each topic, I think it's best to make a literature review for each tag on reviews, so that each topic has a set of references people can add to. It's just not effort to find literature.

147 Answers

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

[IMPORTED]

The trigger happy folks at physics SE have closed the following question for some inexplicable reason:

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/116595/why-application-of-probability-in-qm-is-fundamentally-different-than-application/116609#116609

I hope it can be imported here because the answer is very interesting.

answered Jun 3, 2014 by Hunter (510 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 3, 2014 by Dilaton

Yep, I will import it. Closing such a question as "unclear what you are asking" after it has obtained a beautifull answer remotely looks like trolling ...

@Dilaton Haha, yeah, it does really appear to be trolling in this situation. I just think that physics SE is a prisoner of their own policies since some of the moderators insist on enforcing the letter of the law rather than to enforce the spirit of the law.

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
answered Jun 4, 2014 by wonderich (1,375 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 4, 2014 by dimension10

All imported; thanks!

Thanks! Is there a way that we normal user (not like you dimension10) can import questions by ourselves? 

Hi @Idear, at present the permission are set, such that only super administrators can import questions...

it you think this should be changed, you could open a meta discussion.

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
answered Jun 11, 2014 by jbvega (285 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 11, 2014 by dimension10

Did you forget to complete your answer?

Sorry. I do not know what happened but the answer is empty. Let me re-edit it.

Changed.

All imported!

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

[IMPORTED]

I am adding some physic-related questions/discussions from MathOverflow in which I participated and that are graduate/research level (in my view):

Question on correlation functions and Ising models:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/93765/correlation-function-for-random-graph-ising-model/94629#94629

This question about algebraic attempts to study thermodynamic limits:
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/138066/an-algebraic-approach-to-the-thermodynamic-limit-n-rightarrow-infty

answered Jun 11, 2014 by jbvega (285 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 15, 2014 by Dilaton

It seems that there is suddenly something wrong with the Stack Exchange API (which has been buggy since a while) so I will import these after the people at Stack Exchange fix their bugs.

The bug probably only occurs for MO questions (I am still not able to import either of the two above), but I just could import a P.SE question.

@dimension10 @Dilaton @jbvega This bug is fixed now. The issue was not the .net but the https instead of http.

Thanks @Polarkernel, I have now imported them :-)
 

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
answered Jun 12, 2014 by anonymous [ revision history ]
edited Jun 12, 2014 by Dilaton
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

[UPDATED]

The Physics.SE question

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/116813/ads-space-boundary-and-geodesics

was imported to PhysicsOverflow as

http://www.physicsoverflow.org/18515/ads-space-boundary-and-geodesics

but both the question and the answer(s) were later considerably updated in Physics.SE. I don't know what would be PhysicsOverflow's policy in this case - would it be the case to update the import as well, or not?

answered Jun 14, 2014 by Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro (530 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 14, 2014 by dimension10

Oh yes, it has indeed obtained great extensions ...
So I have simply reimported it for now.

Maybe we should think about how to best keep imported questions synchronized to important updates by means of a meta question.

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

[IMPORTED]

I have one question from my physics.se account which I would like to have imported to this site if possible.

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/118659/homogeneity-of-space/118778#118778

Thank you for your time.

answered Jun 18, 2014 by Spencer (30 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 18, 2014 by dimension10

Imported!

Awesome! Thank you!

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
answered Jul 29, 2014 by drake (885 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 29, 2014 by Dilaton

Oh yes, a nice one !

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

[IMPORTED]

I would be interested to see an answer to the following question:

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/128782/what-is-the-idea-behind-counting-the-number-of-excited-states-and-the-representa

(but I'm not sure if it is considered high-level enough).

answered Jul 30, 2014 by Hunter (510 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 30, 2014 by Dilaton

I have it imported ;-)

Thanks!

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I suggest to import this post of mine that yields a good explanation on the validity of the rotating wave approximation in quantum optics. Thanks.

answered Aug 5, 2014 by JonLester (345 points) [ revision history ]

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow !

It seems we already have a version of this question (and its answers) here, because the whole content of TP.SE has been imported. Which version do you prefer, or should I merge them?

Hi Dilaton, I see that already existed as a user on PO. Now, we have a problem as I registered again as JonLester. I think it would be better to merge users or remove one of them. Sorry but I become aware of PO a few minutes ago due to a post about me here.Thanks a lot beforehand.

This is no problem, I can merge the old imported account into the newly created one, such that you also have access to your imported posts and you will have rep. Your paper I will import shortly too as suggested, if you agree (?).

Ok, I have now reimported the question (it and the answer are higher voted) and merged Jon into JonLester.

@Dilaton Thank you very much. You have been really helpful.

For my paper, you can import it without problem. It is the reason for importing that is somewhat bothering me. :)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...