• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  How does noncommutativity of space imply discreteness at the Planck scale?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

 I have read that noncommutative geometry is a possible way to describe quantum gravity, and that it implies that space becomes discrete at the Planck scale, where the usual notions of distance and measurement break down. However, I do not understand how noncommutativity of space coordinates leads to this conclusion. 

In ordinary quantum mechanics, noncommutativity of operators means that there is an uncertainty relation between their eigenvalues, and that they cannot be simultaneously diagonalized. For example, the position and momentum operators satisfy $[x,p] = i\hbar$, which implies the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. But this does not mean that position or momentum are discrete, only that they are incompatible observables.

Similarly, in noncommutative approach to quantum space-time, the space coordinates satisfy $[x^\mu,x^\nu] = i\theta^{\mu\nu}$, where \theta is a constant antisymmetric tensor. This means that there is a minimal uncertainty in the measurement of space coordinates, and that the usual notion of point-like events is replaced by smeared events. But i have also read that it implies that space is "discretized" into Planck cells, i.e. a spacetime point is replaced by a Planck cell. How the notions of "Planck cells" are derived ? Are they analogue of commutative points ?

I would appreciate any references or explanations that could help me understand this topic better. Thank you.

asked Jan 30 in Q&A by Avi [ no revision ]

It sounds like they are talking about phase space volumes or density of states in phase space. You could try https://inspirehep.net/literature/332804

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights